Framework Paper by Anastasia P. Kamai:
I propose that each of the workshop participants prepare responses to especially items 1, 2 and 4.
- What is your concept of culture? Does Dorothy Lee's definition provide adequate support for your concept of culture?
- What is your definition of traffic culture?
- The workshop will have three levels of discussion:
- a. What additional human needs and factors must be considered in the planning of an urban transport system e.g.
- city size and layout
- traffic movement within the city
- existing road network
- land use policies
- parking
- environmental impacts
- pedestrian flow
- peak-hour crowding on urban transport system
- accidents
- adequacy of off-peak public transport system
- safety / security
- neighbourhoods to be served
- inexpensive (cost factors)
- dependence on private vehicles
- relationship of the city to the needs to the people who live there
- comfort
- aesthetics: architecture, art
- ____________________ other factors etc. please list
- b. How does the culture of a region or country (customs, norms, values, behaviour, experiences, historical perspectives) affect the above considerations in developing an urban transport system. Rank the above and others for the sample cities
- Athens
- Milano
- Lille
- London
- Berlin
- No affect
- c. Which of the factors culturally effected can be implemented and in which of the
following three phases: planning phase, design phase, operations phase?
Here think the specific proposals or input from the workshop participants can be
incorporated into the discussion.
- a. What additional human needs and factors must be considered in the planning of an urban transport system e.g.
- Please provide a brief description of how your proposal fits into the general framework of the workshop.
« Proposed structure for Workshop 3: 'Traffic Culture' by Anastasia P. Kama | Traffic Culture by Thanos Vlastos »