Workshop A1: Culture in EU external relations in collaboration with local and regional authorities
in Maison Heinrich Heine Working languages: English and French
Moderated by Rainer Kern, representative of the Lord Mayor of the City of Mannheim, Germany
with
Anuradha Ananth, Cultural journalist, Cottbus, Germany and previously Head-Features Programming (arts & lifestyle) at NDTV-Hindu, Chennai, India
Eric Lebas, in charge of the Unit for local and regional authorities – Institut Français, France
Cécile Peyronnet, responsible for the European Affairs – Institut Français, France
Anne Poidevin, Project Manager – Direction of European and international relations, City of Strasbourg, France
Rainer Kern
He starts with a painting by Peter Paul Rubens called 'the Ambassadors' to underline cultural diplomacy has been around already for quite some time. Even some say that cultural diplomacy is baroque.
In Germany the Ministry of Foreign Affairs puts emphasis on three domains: economy, politics and culture. The main tool for implementing its cultural policy are the Goethe Institutes around the world.
Just recently there was a round table to illustrate one example: China-Germany and 40 years of cultural diplomacy
At EU level:
-
resolution calls for more culture in diplomatic efforts
-
in every country there should be someone appointed to oversee cultural diplomacy
The resolution entails development, inclusion, innovation, democracy, human rights, education, conflict prevention and reconciliation, mutual understanding (only food is missing)
Cultural Diplomacy in the USA e.g. Madeleine Albright – every guest of hers is taken in the evening to a Jazz club in Washington to experience something typical of American culture, and one can wonder what impact that shall have on negotiations or talks the next day.
There is the Institute for Cultural Diplomacy (icd). It is based in the USA and in Germany and connects all levels. The philosophy is to foster trust, mutual understanding and dialogue.
Since he comes from the City of Mannheim, there culture pertains to all activities and includes social dimensions so that work is not only done with artists.
Anuradha Ananth
Cultural journalist, Cottbus, Germany and previously Head-Features Programming (arts & lifestyle) at NDTV-Hindu, Chennai, India
-
wishes to do research about all cultural institutes, but in this presentation she will focus primarily on the achievements of the Goethe Institute
-
when speaking about culture, then there is included music as intangible heritage which connects to a saying by Merkel that making politics in Europe is like making music
-
written on a stone tableau in front of UNESCO building in Paris is the following:
man must have peace in mind – living cultures / diversity
-
how can intangible heritage break down barriers and support peace?
-
foreign policy section in EU dealing with emerging nations means recognizing that the EU depends upon these nations developing as partners
She wants now to zoom in on India, the country where she comes from and there from the most urbanized region. It has a rich heritage and traded already with Ancient Greece. When conducting a survey of 60 cultural organizations with 200 000 performances, she found out that they were all private, that is not state supported at all. The region is called TN/Chennai urban mela. Cultural activities are realized in collaboration with Goethe / British Council / Indo Italiano. She did her desk research on this question of collaboration.
Taminadu.
Her research questions were leading up to the role of EUNIC: European cultural institutes acting in unison. A key question she put to all was what independence they have in decision making?
Source: www.germany-and-india.com
Of interest is that there is this focus on European perspective, at local levels all avoid taking any position on foreign cultural policy issues.
Cecile Peyronnet – Institut Francais
- Maybe in 30 years EU will show interest in culture in foreign affairs but she does belong to a group for 'more Europe'
- India is a good example but working together is difficult, still we must try to develop common European actions
- Institut Francaise joined EUNIC in 2006 – it is not the voice of governments but to join national cultural institutes outside Europe, we had a lot of obstacles.
- The question about the role of culture in diplomacy – culture is very diverse – but at the end the results of culture in external affairs we do not find any cultural action. It is not the priority. Many representatives do not know what is culture.
- Organize discussions and then address the European Commission that they deal with the cultural dimension – the soft power of the European Union.
- Can create a common identity – it is culture which can unify Europe.
- EU Parliament also interested – discussion within parliament – link to organization 'more Europe' as advocacy group
- EUNIC has 28 members
Eric Lebas – Institut Francais
He will say things which complement what Cecile Peyronnet has already pointed out. Institut Francais is a public institution and does take part in cultural diplomacy. In that sense our role is fairly wide. We have a way of working together with local and regional authorities.
Diplomatic relations and diplomacy is handled at national level, but the experience we make show that local and regional authorities are involved in external relations.
-
challenge of cultural diplomacy - how to involve local and regional authorities who have a role to play in international diplomacy?
-
make use of the resources of cultural creation which exist across the country to make things happen
-
develop special relationship with local and regional authority so that on the basis of this partnership it becomes possible to share experiences and have a shared basis for projects so that cultural cooperation becomes possible.
There is the form of decentralized cooperation which works.
Cultural cooperation is complex and difficult to enter and to make it into an answer as to what local and regional authorities are capable of doing.
Use a cultural network which exists abroad.
Today with the economic crisis it is extremely important to work together.
Obviously economic diplomacy has taken the first place.
Institut Francais in India is organising a 'Bon jour' event across the entire country. It shows that various regions in France are interested in contacts with India.
Anne Poidevin – Strasbourg
She has in mind the role of a local authority e.g. Strasbourg. In that city we have a European Community so that there is an interplay between the French administration and European environment. This brings about a rich cultural policy.
The City of Strasbourg has a special department for International Relations due to the France / Germany border, but more so because of the European Council, the Council of Human Rights, the European Parliament and other institutions being present in the city. We created as a result our own network called 'Club of Strasbourg'. We have gathered in this club big European cities (2004 – 2007) with the objective to exchange experiences, in order to become more efficient at European level.
For example, we implement thereby two schemes centred around the book and illustration.
A third project is around modernist architecture. We try to open up to partnerships with non European architects. The project includes as well buildings outside of Europe.
Report by Eduard Millares
We heard different visions and also one external from India.
Three conclusions may be drawn:
-
almost redundant to talk about internationalism for what is outside is inside Europe which is based on an interaction of institution which are all international now;
-
forces us to rethink the traditional role of state institutions e.g. Cervantes Institute because they do not have the necessary doors outside especially for the local and regional authorities and secondly we need to change the traditional idea of cultural diplomacy by changing to cultural cooperation (Rod Fisher)
-
towns/ regions acting locally/globally – new people involved in the cultural activities – e.g. Twinning – networks – cross border connections – inter regional cooperation – shared ways of evaluating and planning – culture and development
Question by Hatto Fischer
Culture is being discussed here in terms of a specific organisational logic, with some very specific reference to administrative practices, but what does it mean to represent European culture with national, regional and local interpretations?
-
Local and regional authorities and the subsidiarity principle – what happens when they cannot decide by themselves about cultural activities even if done only locally?
-
Greece in the current crisis is not giving a voice to culture at any of these levels, but rather the new policy domain is under the auspices of the Ministry for Education and Religious Affairs, Culture and Sports with ramifications for the negotation between Greece and the EU come the new funding period 2014-2020 (in the period 2000 - 2006 Greece had still its own operational programme for Culture within the EU Structural Fund, but no more in the follow-up period 2007-2013)
-
There is to be noted a fragmentation of cultural institutes within Europe even though what is internal and external may be confusing at time when it comes to national and European representations
-
Then, how to deal with the crisis in Middle East, for nothing has been mentioned so far about inter cultural dialogue as tool for peace with Barenboim and his orchestra setting such an example, and even the dialogue with the Arab world as promised by Marseilles 2013 when a European Capital of Culture is in doubt since the original proposal has not been followed up consistently enough to be convincing.
-
Also a crucial point in the discussion is missing if it would mean only to focus on Europe and the EU; as a matter of fact the EU is but a transitatory stage towards world governance based on Cultural Rights (Habermas), but which shall require nation states to give up some of their sovereign rights with far reaching implications for the respective cultures they claim to uphold cultural identities linked to a sovereign state.
-
Collaboration with UNESCO beyond cultural diversity shall become crucial and already there exist different platforms on cultural heritage / peace and non violence / education, so that culture in foreign policy needs to be tuned into these efforts to raise, for example, literarcy world wide, and to which is linked the Right of every child for education.
-
There exist international organisations like PEN, World Poetry Movement, Arterial Network in Africa and even the idea of Capital of Culture in Africa, America etc. is gaining ground, so that a network of European Capitals of Culture could be extended to include the network of networks.
-
how culture is recognized – the system of cultural selection e.g. in India – why poets only recognized if they have been recognized in Europe and USA – how cultural imperialism still prevails in post colonial terms
-
To come back to Marseilles 2013 and the dialogue with the Arab world, here Europe needs to keep up with all the changes.
Answer: not competent – look for other organisations – cultural operators -
don' t overestimate our capacity – European representation play an important role together with other institutions and often it is a question of people – some experimentation done -
Question: different from institutional levels – Marseilles – treasure we have go through ports with strong identities and experiences in international communication – where are strong relationships – thinking about how we do thinks and not just think about infrastructure – if we put too many administrative levels in then we have problems – national capitals have the possibility to foster international relationships and the system must adapt to where is the vitality
Answer: administrative barriers – blocking politicians by those who are engaged a good thing
Question: Toulouse – towns are very different, Europe is there very little present but what is important is Twinning, cooperation agreements and at a cultural level it is often just a matter of putting on a good show – but now try to work on the long term and not just focus on an event – set-up: people take the initiative and who are the driving force – e.g. circus schools from Toulouse
Answer: within Institut Francais have agreements with British Council and Goethe how to work together in India, for example, so that this can be called the Europeanization of Cultural Institutes
Eduard Millares go beyond the old method of cultural diplomacy to cultural cooperation – culture is not a peripheral activity but coming into the centre – power of culture – today when the towns and regions cooperate to do something in culture they do something which differs from strict artistic exchange – clearly we speak about something else today – training for a new form of governance – the question is how national cultural institution how can they become a useful tool in this new panorama
« Workshops | Workshop A2: Creativity and innovation fostered by local and regional authorities: accomplishments and perspectives »